[ofa-general] [PATCH 1/4] ib/ipoib: specify TClass and FlowLabelwith PR queries for QoS support

Jason Gunthorpe jgunthorpe at obsidianresearch.com
Tue Aug 7 10:34:33 PDT 2007


On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 07:59:46PM +0300, Eitan Zahavi wrote:

> > Can you clarify why you think the SL and rate should be 
> > provided, versus just the traffic class and flow label?

> The broadcast group of the IPoIB subnet should dictate the parameters to
> be used for that subnet.

There is no reason a unicast IPoIB path should be restricted to having
the same SL as the broadcast group. That limits the possible
topologies that can be routed efficiently. Sean's use of the tclass to
derive the SL seems correct to me. Except in unusual cases the SL should
not be specified in a PR query.

Rate and MTU should probably be copied over. Not sure about flowlabel
though..

Jason



More information about the general mailing list