[openib-general] [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

> Quoting Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support
> 
> On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 14:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com>:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 09:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > encode SL in sched_queue field to improve hardware QoS guarantees
> > > > for connected QPs.
> > > 
> > > Is UD already handled properly in terms of mthca ?
> > 
> > It's not the question of "proper" handling - this patch is an enhancement,
> > not really a bug fix. I think mthca already does the best it can with UD AVs.
> 
> So there are no scheduling parameters or anything else that needs
> tweaking in mthca in terms of the SL for UD AVs ? Just want to be sure.

Not that I know.

-- 
MST