[ofa-general] Re: Re: IPoIB-CM UC mode

[Or Gerlitz]

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> I don't see why are you trying to get rid of keepalives.
> With RC we currently have an arbitrary ACK timeout, and this
> is no different, and quite easy to implement.

Since we agree (?) that RC is bad for IPoIB-CM and I want to find a way 
for a UC based implementation to avoid implementing a dedicated keep 
alive protocol.

As for all your other comments, I need to think more, will get back to 
it later this week.

Or.