[ofa-general] Re: opensm: a bug in heavy sweep? - no LFT re-configuration

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

On 07:08 Tue 24 Jul     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>  On 7/23/07, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Eitan,
> >
> > On 20:59 Mon 23 Jul     , Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> > > Hi Sasha, Hal,
> > >
> > > I think I have an idea:
> > >
> > > Since this is a specific switch that reported ChangeBit or Trap why
> > > can't we just qualify that there was no change in the switch setup?
> >
> > The ChangeBit seems to be good start point - then OpenSM will query all
> > switch ports PortInfo anyway and if for all ports PortState is <= INIT
> > (and at least for one port it is = INIT), it means that this switch was
> > rebooted/reinitialized.
> >
> > And for single port PortState drop to = INIT should indicate
> > reinitialization.
> >
> > Seems correct?
> 
> 
>  Wouldn't this be all ports in INIT indicate reset of switch ?

It includes not connected ports too, so I guess it should be <= INIT .

Sasha