[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] IB/mthca: support multiple completion vectors

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

> Quoting Roland Dreier <rdreier at cisco.com>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] IB/mthca: support multiple completion vectors
> 
>  > I don't know how many vectors make sense, so I decided to be
>  > conservative here, since each EQ consumes a lot of memory by default.
> 
> I think #vectors == O(#CPUs) is what we should aim for.

What do you suggest to do about memory scalaibility?

-- 
MST