[ofa-general] IPOB CM (NOSRQ) [PATCH V9] patch

[Sean Hefty]

> In the interest of reaching a quick resolution, would it be acceptable if I put
> in a warning message (printing current memory usage) when memory usage say exceeds 1GB 
> for no srq and also eliminate the max_receive_buffer module parameter. Is that 
> satisfactory?

That would work for me.  You could even print a warning if the user 
configures ipoib such that it could exceed X GBs.

That would only leave the max_rc_qp parameter, right?  Is there any 
reason not to rename this to max_conn_qp in case UC support were ever 
added?  Or would we want separate parameters for RC and UC?  (Other 
changes I suggested could easily wait until we have a UC implementation.)

- Sean