[ofa-general] librdmacm and libmthca question

[Doug Ledford]

On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 00:00 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
> >might be of value to document somewhere that the initiator depth and
> >responder resources are not directly related to the actual work queue
> >depth, and that without some sort of intervention, are not that high.
> 
> FYI - I am currently updating the librdmacm man pages based on your other
> e-mail.  I will make sure to document these values.
> 
> >This leads one to believe that the values are OK, even though they fail
> >when you use the same values in rdma_accept.  A note to this effect in
> >the man pages would help.
> 
> I will at least note how to obtain the correct maximum for local
> responder_resources by querying the local HCA.  The correct setting for
> initiator_depth needs to come from the remote endpoint.

Works for Me (TM)

> Please continue to let me know what other problems you run into.  I'd like to
> address as many issues as possible for the next release.  (New features will be
> pushed out some.)

Will do.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford at redhat.com>
              GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
              http://people.redhat.com/dledford

Infiniband specific RPMs available at
              http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20071011/06260a59/attachment.sig>