[ofa-general] Re: the port numbers in some of the rdmacm examples is a fixed value

[Dotan Barak]

Sean Hefty wrote:
>> I started to work on this patch and for ucmatose everything is fine.
>> The problem is with udaddy: the parameter "-p" is only being used for
>> the port space ...
>> (I really would like to have the same parameter for controlling the port
>> number for ALL of the examples
>> of the librdmacm, but i must admit that without doing some changes it
>> won't happen) ...
>>     
>
> I'd prefer to use the same parameter as well.  If no one objects, I'm okay with
> modifying the udaddy -p parameter.
>
>   
>> what do you think?
>> (do you want me to send you the changes i made so far?)
>>     
>
> Sending me the changes that you have would be fine.  I can finish them up when I
> get some time.
>   
O.k., i sent you one patch which contains:
1) typo fixes (in test name of error message) + spelling typos
2) start of port support to control the port numbers from the command line
(if you wish, i can supply two different patches)

Only a one minute work is required to close this issue and fix the port 
number support of the udaddy.


thanks
Dotan