[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] mthca: mthca_QUERY_ADAPTER reads fields which are reserved in memfree

[Roland Dreier]

Thansk, applied.

 > I left the non-memfree implementation as it was before.  Its possible that
 > the memfree implementation is good for non-memfree as well, in which case
 > the "if (mthca_is_memfree)" conditions can be eliminated (i.e., just
 > use the memfree implementation unconditionally).

What would make the memfree implementation no good for non-memfree?
How can we find out whether we can make that simplification?