[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] - [resend] Corrects a race in ipoib_cm_post_receive_nonsrq()

[Roland Dreier]

 > Thanks for writing up this patch. I have been extremely busy dealing with 
 > some hot issues and hence the delayed response. I did see Shirley's 
 > response and yes it looks okay to me too. In the same vein that we have 
 > been distinguishing the nonsrq functions (from the generic or srq ones), 
 > would you consider renaming ipoib_cm_init_rx_wr() to something with nonsrq 
 > suffix? Thanks!

That would make sense but ipoib_cm_init_rx_wr() is also called from
ipoib_cm_dev_init() even when an SRQ is available.  So it's not really a
"nonsrq" function.

 - R.