[ofa-general] [SDP]How does buffer size affect SDP bandwidth performance?

[linyao]

Hi, all

  When I use netperf to test SDP bandwidth performance, I was confused with a problem. My test results show that the bandwidth performance is better while the send and receive buffer size is smaller. How does it explain? 

  How dose buffer size affect SDP bandwidth performance?

  The table below is the result of my test. The second column is the result with 16M send buffer and 8M receive buffer. The third column is the result with 256K send buffer and 256K receive buffer. The last column is the result with 16K send buffer and 87380B receive buffer. 

Package Size(Byte)          Bandwidth(Mbps)
128                    684.51    682.55     725.43 
256                    1095.85   979.69    945.82 
512                    1498.62   1527.56   2474.6 
1024                   3191.12   4210.58   5147.91 
2048                   3994.1    5356.29   7212.09 
4096                   4546.15   6208.94   8127.58 
8192                   5962.7    7260.09   8621.43 
16384                  5100.91   6364.46   6575.32 
32768                  7446.83   6870.21   8889.46 
65536                  6617.12   7044.84   8992.61 
131072                 6587.27   6909.3    8867.24 


  My test is on two nodes. Each node is a DELL SC430 PC server, which has one 2.8GHz Intel Pentium-4 processor and 1GB DDR II-400 main Memory. These two nodes are interconnected with both Gigabit Ethernet and Mellanox In?niBand DDR HCAs. 

  Each node runs RedHat AS 4.0 with Linux kernel 2.6.20. I use OpenFabrics OFED-1.2 and Firmware 1.2.0. Netperf has two options "-s" and "-S" to set the size of socket send buffer and socket receive buffer. The former is for local and the latter is for remote. I used these two options to set different size values for socket send and receive buffer in the local and remote. I think they represent the SDP send and receive buffer size, right?

  Any reply would be appreciated! Thank you!


2008-07-15 



linyao 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20080715/0f0917ce/attachment.html>