[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] opensm: update Release Notes for OpenSM version 3.2
sashak at voltaire.com
Wed Oct 15 03:33:50 PDT 2008
On 16:13 Tue 14 Oct , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Isn't it at best equal rather than much less critical ? The reason I
> say at best equal is that it's the first joiner's parameters are used
> for all SNM groups which could "lock out" the majority of users.
> That's not the case with IPv4 where the group parameters are
> configured and only those which don't match can't participate.
Aren't mcmember record parameters (MTU and Rate) for IPv6 SNM join
copied from IPv4's mcmember record?
More information about the general