[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] opensm/osm_ucast_file.c: Fix return status from do_ucast_file_load when file name is not provided

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com>wrote:

> On 06:36 Wed 12 Aug     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> > Does that really make sense for this case when there no files supplied
> and
> > file is specified ?
>
> This is for case when one of the files (or both) is *not* specified,
> like this:
>
>   opensm ... -R file -U lft-file
>
> , which is pretty useful.


I'm asking about the utility of:

opensm -R file

(no -U and no -M)

Why shouldn't that case fallback ?

-- Hal


>
>
> Sasha
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20090812/c858b716/attachment.html>