***SPAM*** Re: [ofa-general] Re: [RFC] OpenSM vendor layer

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com> wrote:
> On 14:47 Fri 06 Feb     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>
>> Actually, although more disruptive, it might be cleaner (and safer in
>> the long run) to add to the vendor API. There could be additional osm
>> vendor APIs for pkeys and gids
>
> I don't think so - existing osm_vendor_get_all_port_attr() call
> following its name could/should provide *all* port attributes already,
> no needs for new APIs.

I can see cases where rather than getting all port attr, it would be
useful to get the bound port's attributes without all the rest.

-- Hal

> Sasha
>