***SPAM*** Re: [ofa-general] Re: [RFC] OpenSM vendor layer

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com> wrote:
> On 07:41 Sat 07 Feb     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>
>> I can see cases where rather than getting all port attr, it would be
>> useful to get the bound port's attributes without all the rest.
>
> Then it is probably simpler just to use umad_get_port(). Why to bother
> with all those OpenSM vendor junks?

Is bypassing it's vendor layer acceptable for OpenSM unless we are
going to totally remove it and go straight to umad (which I'm not
proposing) ?

-- Hal

> Sasha
>