<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2654.45">
<TITLE>RE: [openib-general] Re: uverbs events</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Well this is the description of this bug, but we got this problem of 64-bits arithmetic on a simple if and not switch.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From this reason I suggested to give it a try.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Tziporet</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Roland Dreier [<A HREF="mailto:roland@topspin.com">mailto:roland@topspin.com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 6:39 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: Tziporet Koren</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Cc: Grant Grundler; openib-general@openib.org</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: uverbs events</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2> Tziporet> Very important - there is a bug in gcc version 3.4.2</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> Tziporet> that had been fixed in gcc 3.4.3. This bug ((# 17581)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> Tziporet> heart us in VAPI when full optimizations is working in</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> Tziporet> bits or on 64 bits systems.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Thanks, but if the bug you're talking about is</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2> <A HREF="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17581" TARGET="_blank">http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17581</A></FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>then I don't think that's going to affect us -- we don't seem to do</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>any 64-bit arithmetic inside a switch statement.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2> - R.</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>