<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2654.45">
<TITLE>RE: [openib-general] InfiniBand Test Project === IBTP ===</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I think that a trunk directory will be more meaningful, as for the naming convention I also agree that we should match the kernel or userspace tree structure</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Sean Hefty [<A HREF="mailto:sean.hefty@intel.com">mailto:sean.hefty@intel.com</A>] </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 7:35 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: 'Hal Rosenstock'; Amit Krig</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Cc: openib-general@openib.org</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: RE: [openib-general] InfiniBand Test Project === IBTP ===</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>>> The proposed new dir can be under Gen2/trunk =></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>> <A HREF="https://openib.org/svn/gen2/trunk/ibtp/" TARGET="_blank">https://openib.org/svn/gen2/trunk/ibtp/</A></FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>My preference would be to place it until a test or existing util directory, rather than trunk directly.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>>> * core</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>> * ulps</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>> * ipoib</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>> * sdp</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>> * srp</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>> * kdapl</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>> * iser</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>The indentation of this looks wrong to me. core and ulps at the same </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>level in the tree; everything else below ulps. Should it be ulps or ulp </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>as in the actual kernel tree ?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I agree that matching the kernel or userspace tree structure would be better.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>- Sean</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>