<html><body>
<p><tt>general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org wrote on 05/03/2007 11:39:43 AM:<br>
<br>
> > Enhance ipoib to use multiple completion vectors if available.<br>
> > On mthca, this increases netperf BW by some 5% with<br>
> > same or lower service demand.<br>
> <br>
> I wonder if this is the best way to use multiple vectors in IPoIB.<br>
> Shirley has pointed out that right now we can't scale to both ports on<br>
> 2-port adapters because both ports end up using the same interrupt.<br>
> So maybe we want to target each port to separate completion vectors<br>
> when available?<br>
> <br>
> - R.</tt><br>
<br>
Yes, it would be better to do perPort/perCompletion/perEvent/perInterrupt. It also helps latency not just throughput.<br>
<br>
Shirley Ma<br>
IBM Linux Technology Center</body></html>