<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/24/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Or Gerlitz</b> <<a href="mailto:ogerlitz@voltaire.com">ogerlitz@voltaire.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Ganesh Sadasivan wrote:<br>> I have a connection manager running as a separate<br>> process from the apps which would be sending/receiving data on QPs. I<br>> was hoping to create IB objects via CM and be made sharable to the apps.
<br><br>Should this process do all connection management or only listen to new<br>connection requests and then tell another process to handle it (that is<br>create CQ/QP, accept the connection etc)?</blockquote><div><br>I was thinking of doing the former way. But that requires sharing of CQ/QP etc.
<br>So now going ahead with plan where the CM setups up some minimal set of QPs<br>through which the clients can send their connection requests and the clients themselves<br>handle creation of IB objects like QP, CQ . However there are other cases where it is
<br>benefitial to share the QPs across multiple processes. So creating IB objects in shared <br>memory is useful.<br><br>Thanks<br>Ganesh<br><br><br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Or.<br><br></blockquote></div><br>