<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif, "EmojiFont", "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols;" dir="ltr">
><br>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"></div>
<div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; color:rgb(0,0,0)">
This sort of situation is where I miss something like the (now deprecated) 'sockets' provider. As documented at least, it supported the entire interface. Of course that would be work to maintain (and I'm not volunteering, heh), but a thing doesn't have to perform
well to be beneficial.</div>
<</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It's an unfortunate irony that you have a consistent API that abstract away the differences between providers, but you have to fill your code with #ifdef's to work around the different features that are supported by those providers.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>JB<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>