<html><body><p><tt><font size="2">"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@intel.com> wrote on 05/25/2018 19:05:40:<br><br>> From: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@intel.com></font></tt><br><tt><font size="2">> To: Bernard Metzler <BMT@zurich.ibm.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca></font></tt><br><tt><font size="2">> Cc: "ofa_boardplus@lists.openfabrics.org, " <br>> <ofa_boardplus@lists.openfabrics.org>, "Coulter, Susan K" <br>> <skc@lanl.gov>, "Davis, Arlin R" <arlin.r.davis@intel.com></font></tt><br><tt><font size="2">> Date: 05/25/2018 19:05</font></tt><br><tt><font size="2">> Subject: RE: [Ofa_boardplus] OFA Repo and Maintainer List cleanup</font></tt><br><tt><font size="2">> <br>> > > It would be useful to know if IBM is still using DAPL.<br>> > ><br>> > > Bernard can you find out?<br>> > ><br>> > So, yes, DB2 PureScale still uses it, and currently relies on it. So<br>> > IBM will find a solution to live without it, when uDAPL goes away.<br>> <br>> Effectively, DAPL is no longer active. Last release was 1.5 years <br>> ago, with 1 commit since then (10 months ago).<br>> <br>> Bernard, is DB2 PureScale Linux only, or does it require support for<br>> other operating systems?<br>> </font></tt><br><br><tt><font size="2">Hi Sean, it is supported on AIX as well - using an AIX uDAPL library.</font></tt><br><br><tt><font size="2">Best,</font></tt><br><tt><font size="2">Bernard.</font></tt><BR>
</body></html>