<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Some of the repos on the OFA are still used by the EWG to create OFED. DAPL is mostly in maintenance mode and it would be easier to leave it where it is<br>
since moving it would actually require more work. Also, I believe that vlad stages the kernel code in a git tree on the OFA server to allow adding the backports and<br>
create the RPMs and various packages. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">I agree that for old git trees that are now maintained elsewhere, we should remove those but not the ones that are still being actively used.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_____replyseparator"></a><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Ofa_boardplus [mailto:ofa_boardplus-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Coulter, Susan K<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, June 04, 2018 11:18 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Hal Rosenstock <hal@mellanox.com><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>; ofa_boardplus@lists.openfabrics.org, <ofa_boardplus@lists.openfabrics.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Ofa_boardplus] New OpenFabricsSoftware webpage<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Wonderful. <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hal - Can you let me know when your repos have been moved ?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Arlin/Woody - Can you talk about how removing the OFA git site affects the EWG?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Removing it completely would be the optimal goal.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">DAPL would have to go somewhere, and I’m not sure if the OFA bugzilla would be affected by this.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Jun 4, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Hal Rosenstock <<a href="mailto:hal@mellanox.com">hal@mellanox.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 05:36:07PM +0000, Coulter, Susan K wrote:<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"> Please see the attached preso.<br>
It is a list of the repos on the OFA git site.<br>
The top section are the only repos that look remotely valid.<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
~tnikolova/{libi40iw, libiwpm, libnes} and ~halr/libibumad are all<br>
superseded by rdma-core.<br>
<br>
mstflint is superseded by<br>
<br>
<a href="https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith">https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith</a><br>
ub.com%2FMellanox%2Fmstflint&data=02%7C01%7Chal%40mellanox.com%7<br>
C0e1601ec12284bf4b83a08d5ca408abf%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f4<br>
61b%7C0%7C0%7C636637300927610895&sdata=gZd7Uy6b%2BeIM7jD%2FK9h<br>
FCfyhl1wW9bJc9u8PPMd2R%2Bo%3D&reserved=0<br>
<br>
Ignoring the clearly EWG/OFED stuff that leaves<br>
<br>
~ardavis/dapl.git<br>
~halr/ibsim.git<br>
~halr/opensm.git<br>
<br>
Hal: Do you think we should move ibsim and opensm to linux-rdma's github<br>
project? Or someplace else?<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
I think that linux-rdma github is fine for these repos. ~hal/dump_pr.git should go there too.<br>
<br>
-- Hal<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">No idea what to do with DAPL, if EWG starts a OFA github project then<br>
maybe move it there?<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"> If we can ultimately move the valid bits to github - we can then<br>
discontinue a separate git site.<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
Strongly recommend EWG re-organize their process around github or<br>
similar..<br>
<br>
Jason<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">================================<br>
Susan Coulter<br>
LANL / USRC / HPC-DES<br>
Network Lead<br>
(505) 412-6525<br>
Lokah Samastah Sukhino Bhavantu<br>
================================<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>