<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7234.20">
<TITLE>Re: [ofw] Sonoma presentation on future of WinOF</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>There are 2 sessions on Windows. Microsoft will present one, and OFW will present the second.<BR>
<BR>
Gilad<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
----- Original Message -----<BR>
From: ofw-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org <ofw-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org><BR>
To: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>; ofw@lists.openfabrics.org <ofw@lists.openfabrics.org><BR>
Cc: Jeffrey Scott <jeff@splitrockpr.com><BR>
Sent: Wed Apr 02 03:43:46 2008<BR>
Subject: RE: [ofw] Sonoma presentation on future of WinOF<BR>
<BR>
This would be really bad. Microsoft is investing heavily in their<BR>
Server 2008 product with plans for HPC clustering. I believe the<BR>
interest in IB on Windows is just starting to happen.<BR>
<BR>
Who made the decision to cancel this presentation? Perhaps the lack of<BR>
visibility as well as a lack of new releases of the Win OF stack caused<BR>
someone to believe that it was not active.<BR>
<BR>
QLogic has recently added to their development team specifically to<BR>
support and build on the Win OF plans. We have no intention of letting<BR>
it slow down in any way.<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: ofw-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org<BR>
[<A HREF="mailto:ofw-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org">mailto:ofw-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org</A>] On Behalf Of Sean Hefty<BR>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 6:49 PM<BR>
To: ofw@lists.openfabrics.org<BR>
Cc: Jeffrey Scott<BR>
Subject: [ofw] Sonoma presentation on future of WinOF<BR>
<BR>
I just noticed that the previously scheduled presentation on the future<BR>
of winof<BR>
has been removed from the OFA workshop agenda. Does anyone have any<BR>
info on<BR>
why?<BR>
<BR>
It's possible not a lot of the attendees at the conference will care<BR>
much about<BR>
Windows, but I do think that ofw should discuss and come to some<BR>
conceptual<BR>
agreements on the overall, *long term* direction to take the stack.<BR>
<BR>
- Sean<BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
ofw mailing list<BR>
ofw@lists.openfabrics.org<BR>
<A HREF="http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw">http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw</A><BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
ofw mailing list<BR>
ofw@lists.openfabrics.org<BR>
<A HREF="http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw">http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw</A><BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>