<div dir="ltr">Right now, I don't see obvious way to eliminate that message for AF_INET6 as sometimes it's appropriate and other times not.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Michael Di Domenico <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mdidomenico4@gmail.com" target="_blank">mdidomenico4@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">the patch does work. the only complaint i might register is that the<br>
first time through the loop you still get an ifconf ioctl error in the<br>
log file. it does proceed along to bind to the AF_INET afterwards,<br>
but it might cause a red herring support issue later on<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Hal Rosenstock<br>
<<a href="mailto:hal.rosenstock@gmail.com">hal.rosenstock@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I have supplied a patch for Michael to try and will submit it to rdma-core<br>
> once tested...<br>
><br>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Weiny, Ira <<a href="mailto:ira.weiny@intel.com">ira.weiny@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> We probably need to fall back to an AF_INET check. I did not realize that<br>
>> disabling ipv6 would cause this to fail because AF_INET6 usually “covers”<br>
>> AF_INET. My guess here is that if you excluded IPv6 support from the kernel<br>
>> that would explain the failure.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Perhaps you could try a patch which falls back to AF_INET?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Ira<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> From: Users [mailto:<a href="mailto:users-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org">users-bounces@lists.<wbr>openfabrics.org</a>] On Behalf Of Hal<br>
>> Rosenstock<br>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 8:59 AM<br>
>> To: Michael Di Domenico <<a href="mailto:mdidomenico4@gmail.com">mdidomenico4@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> Cc: <a href="mailto:users@lists.openfabrics.org">users@lists.openfabrics.org</a><br>
>> Subject: Re: [Users] ibacm?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> This makes more sense ;-)<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> What were the steps used to disable ipv6 ?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Michael Di Domenico<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:mdidomenico4@gmail.com">mdidomenico4@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> it looks like i found the culprit<br>
>><br>
>> when running ibacm out of the box on rhel 7.4 the ibacm.log shows<br>
>><br>
>> acm_if_iter_sys: ioctl ifconf error -1<br>
>><br>
>> if i change the line<br>
>><br>
>> s = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);<br>
>><br>
>> to<br>
>><br>
>> s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);<br>
>><br>
>> as Hal suggested and start the ibacm daemon i acm correctly bind to be<br>
>> ipoib addresses and interfaces. my initial report of this change not<br>
>> being effective was a miss communication in that i though it related<br>
>> to the client and not the service process<br>
>><br>
>> i can then run<br>
>><br>
>> ib_acme -f i -s 172.22.64.96 -d 172.22.64.96 -S 172.22.64.96 -v V<br>
>><br>
>> and get back valid data<br>
>><br>
>> ib_acme -d <hostname> still doesn't work, but that might be internal<br>
>> we don't currently have reverse/forward entries for our ipoib<br>
>> interfaces, i'm still looking into it<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Michael Di Domenico<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:mdidomenico4@gmail.com">mdidomenico4@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > it's come to my attention that ibacm might not be working correctly on<br>
>> > my cluster, but i'm unable to determine why ibacm is failing<br>
>> ><br>
>> > here's what i did<br>
>> ><br>
>> > ib_acme -A -O<br>
>> > systemctl restart ibacm<br>
>> ><br>
>> > in the /var/log/ibacm file i see<br>
>> ><br>
>> > acm_if_iter_sys: ioctl ifconf error -1<br>
>> > acmp_join_group: qib0 1 pkey 0xffff, sl 0x0, rate 0x3, mtu 0x4<br>
>> > acm_server: started<br>
>> ><br>
>> > but when i try to query the node locally<br>
>> ><br>
>> > ib_acme -d node001 -v -V<br>
>> ><br>
>> > in the log file i see<br>
>> ><br>
>> > acm_svr_resolve_dest: notice - unknown local end point address<br>
>> ><br>
>> > on the console i see<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Service: localhost<br>
>> > Destination: 172.21.80.1<br>
>> > ib_acm_resolve_ip failed: cannot assign requested address<br>
>> > SA verification: failed cannot assign requested address<br>
>> ><br>
>> > the ibacm_addr.cfg contains<br>
>> > node001 qib0 1 default<br>
>> > node001-1 qib0 1 default<br>
>> ><br>
>> > all the nodes in the cluster are configured the exact same way. and<br>
>> > produce the same result when trying to query locally or a remote node<br>
>> ><br>
>> > any thoughts?<br>
>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>> Users mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Users@lists.openfabrics.org">Users@lists.openfabrics.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://lists.openfabrics.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>