[openfabrics-ewg] Issues with the OFED 1.1 (openib-1.1.tgz)
Ira Weiny
weiny2 at llnl.gov
Wed Aug 16 10:56:59 PDT 2006
I am wondering why the openib-1.1.tgz userspace sources are not simply a tar of
the https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/1.1 branch, or better yet a tag
somewhere marked 1.1rc1? In the end I would assume that
openib-1.1/src/userspace from openib-1.1.tgz would exactly match that tag,
right?
The specific issues I have found thus far are:
1) I already emailed about the autogen.sh missing from libibverbs. I really
feel that all of the source (including *.[in,am]) should be included in this
tarball. I can understand an argument against the autogen stuff but it
really is easier to just leave it in there, right?
2) There were Makefiles which slipped in osm. These files are not checked into
the 1.1 branch. They obviously got tar'ed up by accident.
3) Finally, what is the purpose of the user_fixes patches. Why are they not
part of the branch? And why is there only libmthca_stddef.patch in
https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/1.1/ofed/patches/user_fixes/ when there
are 3 (libibverbs_have_sysfs_read_hack.patch libmthca_fence.patch
libmthca_stddef.patch) in the tarball? Shouldn't these be simply changes on
the branch SVN, _NO_ patches at all?
Thanks,
Ira Weiny
LLNL
More information about the ewg
mailing list