[openfabrics-ewg] Cisco SQA results so far for OFED 1.0 rc5

Tziporet Koren tziporet at mellanox.co.il
Mon Jun 5 11:38:37 PDT 2006


They were run - but we did not compare results to rc4


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen) [mailto:sweitzen at cisco.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:25 PM
To: Tziporet Koren; Pavel Shamis
Cc: openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
Subject: RE: [openfabrics-ewg] Cisco SQA results so far for OFED 1.0 rc5

So these tests were not run before releasing rc5?

Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tziporet Koren [mailto:tziporet at mellanox.co.il] 
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:44 AM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen); Pavel Shamis
> Cc: openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
> Subject: RE: [openfabrics-ewg] Cisco SQA results so far for 
> OFED 1.0 rc5
> 
> We will run the verbs performance tests to make sure nothing 
> happened to
> the basic verbs performance.
> I will publish results tomorrow
> 
> Tziporet
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openfabrics-ewg-bounces at openib.org
> [mailto:openfabrics-ewg-bounces at openib.org] On Behalf Of Scott
> Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 6:33 PM
> To: Pavel Shamis
> Cc: openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
> Subject: RE: [openfabrics-ewg] Cisco SQA results so far for 
> OFED 1.0 rc5
> 
> > Hi,
> > The default mtu size in mvapich-RC5 was changed to MTU1024 
> > (it solves bw 
> > issue on PCI_X). You can try  VIADEV_DEFAULT_MTU=MTU2048 
> parameter on 
> > your platforms (PCI_EX) and I believe that you will get the 
> > rc4 latency 
> > numbers.
> 
> I'll try that for MVAPICH, but that doesn't explain the worse latency
> for Open MPI and Intel MPI.
> 
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> openfabrics-ewg mailing list
> openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openfabrics-ewg
> 




More information about the ewg mailing list