[openfabrics-ewg] How well does "new" SDP scale?

Aviram Gutman aviram at dev.mellanox.co.il
Sun Oct 1 00:17:45 PDT 2006


Yes, it also passed in Mellanox with more then 1000 connections.

Chet Mehta wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> Yes, the older version was the one in OFED 1.0.
>
> :Chet.
>
>
> *"Scott Weitzenkamp \(sweitzen\)" <sweitzen at cisco.com>*
>
> 09/29/2006 11:07 AM
>
> 	
> To
> 	Chet Mehta/Austin/IBM at IBMUS, "OpenFabricsEWG" 
> <openfabrics-ewg at openib.org>
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	RE: [openfabrics-ewg] How well does "new" SDP scale?
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> Can you define what you mean by older?  OFED 1.0 FCS?
>  
> We've tested 800 SDP connections on 32 nodes, this passes with OFED 
> 1.1 (any rc) but did not with OFED 1.0.
>  
> Scott Weitzenkamp
> SQA and Release Manager
> Server Virtualization Business Unit
> Cisco Systems
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* openfabrics-ewg-bounces at openib.org 
> [mailto:openfabrics-ewg-bounces at openib.org] *On Behalf Of *Chet Mehta*
> Sent:* Friday, September 29, 2006 7:58 AM*
> To:* OpenFabricsEWG*
> Subject:* [openfabrics-ewg] How well does "new" SDP scale?
>
>
> Can anyone that has been testing OFED 1.1 comment on number of nodes 
> on which SDP was tested? We had found problems with the older version 
> of SDP when we started scaling beyond 64 nodes. Wondering how the 
> newer version does? Thx!
>
> :Chet.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> openfabrics-ewg mailing list
> openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openfabrics-ewg
>   





More information about the ewg mailing list