[ewg] Re: [PATCH 0/5 VNIC] VNIC patch series for OFED-1.2andOFED-1.2.c

[John Russo]

Actually we do.  We have started to move in that direction, it is just a
matter of allocating a resource to do the leg work.  I was only trying
to address the specific question that was asked.

-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Dreier [mailto:rdreier at cisco.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 3:35 PM
To: John Russo
Cc: Hal Rosenstock; Lakshmanan, Madhu; vlad at mellanox.co.il;
ewg at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] Re: [PATCH 0/5 VNIC] VNIC patch series for
OFED-1.2andOFED-1.2.c

 > Either one RPM per ULP, defined directories and/or naming conventions
 > would work.
 > 
 > Either that or make it simple for each vendor to take the base OFED
 > stack and plug in their own ULPs for their own customer base.

Sounds like you don't have any plans to get the VNIC driver into the
standard kernel?

 - R.