[ewg] RE: how to handle OFEd 1.2 bugs in bugzilla

[Tziporet Koren]

All,

Please clean bugs that you opened for OFED 1.1/1.0 so we can work with
bugzilla in efficient manner with OFED 1.2.

For bugs that were found in previous OFED releases and are still
relevant for OFED 1.2 please change product version so I will see them
when I look at OFED 1.2 bugs.

Thanks,
Tziporet 

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen) [mailto:sweitzen at cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:13 PM
To: Tziporet Koren; Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
Cc: EWG; OPENIB
Subject: RE: how to handle OFEd 1.2 bugs in bugzilla

Yes, I'd like to add alpha1, etc. version numbers in bugzilla.

For existing bugs, the Reporter and Assignee should try to
communicate/negotiate Priority/Severity.  For bugs in areas that Cisco
supports, I review the bugs and try to ask for desired ones to be fixed.
I was happy with the responses I got for OFED 1.1 from Mellanox and Open
MPI.

If you want a bug scrub, I suggest a distributed one, where someone from
each company scrubs the bugs in areas they are responsible for.

Scott 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tziporet Koren [mailto:tziporet at mellanox.co.il] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 6:18 AM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: EWG; OPENIB
> Subject: how to handle OFEd 1.2 bugs in bugzilla
> 
> Hi Scott and all,
> I wish to consult with you in the way we will treat OFED 1.2 bugs in 
> bugzilla.
> 
> 1. Do we want to have 1.2-alpha 1.2-beta, 1.2-rcX in version, or just 
> 1.2 as we have now
> 2. What do we wish to do with bugs that were opened for 1.1 and are 
> still open?
> 3. What to do with old bugs that where open to gen2 in general?
> 4. What is our methodology for priority and severity setup? 
> (There are 
> too many  blocker bugs still open in OFED 1.1 so they are not 
> actually 
> blockers or they were fixed but not updated)
> 
> Thanks,
> Tziporet
>