[ewg] Re: [ofa-general] ANNOUNCE ofed backports for 2.6.22 kernel bits
Arthur Jones
arthur.jones at qlogic.com
Mon Jul 23 13:06:40 PDT 2007
hi michael, ...
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:41:08AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> For whom it may concern,
> I have created an ofed git tree updated with kernel bits from 2.6.22-rc4,
> and put that up at git://git.openfabrics.org/~mst/ofed_kernel.git
> [...]
> In particular, there were a ton of ipath patches that it seems were
> for the most part applied.
> Qlogic maintainers, please help double check that I did not miss something
> of value.
thanks for setting this up, i'm still looking
at the diffs to make sure things got setup
correctly for the ipath stuff...
i have found it difficult to navigate the
source having to run:
./ofed_scripts/configure --kernel-version=2.6.xxx --without-quilt
everytime to check against our tree. so, rather
than spending the better part of the afternoon
running these scripts by hand, i created a shell
script to populate a bunch of branches with the
backports in each branch.
at qlogic we now keep the backports as branches in
our git tree and this, i find, is much easier to
handle. because:
* viewing and navigating backport source becomes
_much_ easier.
* merges are easier -- patches are much more fragile
than branches.
* comparisons are easier -- checking for differences
between backports and between a backport and the
canonical source is faster and more convenient...
* changesets are readable. trying to decipher diffs
to patches is medically proven to take months, if not
years, off your life.
anyway, what do you think? is there anyway i could
convince you to dump the backport patches and put
all the backports in branches? i'm willing to do the
legwork if you see value...
arthur
More information about the ewg
mailing list