[ewg] Re: [OMPI devel] [ofa-general] Re: OMPI over ofed udapl - bugs opened

[Donald Kerr]

I guess I have not read enough about iwarp yet but if iwarp is sitting 
below ib verbs or udapl in the stack and is trying to impose 
restrictions which ib verbs or udapl do not adhere to then maybe iwarp 
is in the wrong place in the ofed stack.
 
Having said that I do agree the OMPI community needs to consider where 
iwarp plays in its own stack. If it has not already.

Steve Wise wrote:

>On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 16:27 -0400, Donald Kerr wrote:
>  
>
>>So then I agree with Andrew, I think you are trying to impose 
>>restrictions on uDAPL which are not part of the Spec.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>true, but if you want a single btl for IB and IW, then you'll need to
>address this issue in some way...
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>devel mailing list
>devel at open-mpi.org
>http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>  
>