[ewg] Re: split CQs for IPOIB UD

[Eli Cohen]

On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 10:13 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
> >  > what about this patch:
> >  > http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2008-March/048322.html
> >
> > Looks mostly OK, I plan to merge it.
> 
> Hi Eli,
> 
> OK, so we start a review here, good! I see now (that you made a day later a v1 post for this patch @ http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2008-March/048381.html fixing some receive size calculations, and that some variations plus fixes exist in the copy and related patches in ofed 1.3. For example the call to skb_orphan() was moved from where it is placed here, there's a bug fix for the CQ size calculations, ipoib_ib_handle_tx_wc() gets a "need_lock" flag, etc.
> 
> Please let us know if you want to merge the v1 post (can it be updated such that it
> applies against the current git?) or you want first to update it etc.

Hi Or,
thanks for noticing the v1 post. However, the v1 post only fixed CQ size
calculation and all the other changes you mention I can't see. Also v1
matches what I have in my git tree. Did I miss something?