[ewg] status of ofed ipoib changes which are not upstream

[Or Gerlitz]

Eli Cohen wrote:
>>     15	kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_0190_unsig_udqp.patch
> On older kernels this patch seems to improve throughput of small
> messages so we should make the effort to include it. I would like to
> verify this again and if this is correct I will send for review.
I don't see why should performance gain only with old kernels justify 
including such patch, Roland?
>>     16	kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_0210_draft_wr.patch
>>     17	kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_0220_ud_post_list.patch
>>     18	kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_0230_srq_post_n.patch
>>     19	kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_0250_non_srq_param.patch
>>     20	kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_0290_reduce_cm_tx.patch
>>     21	kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_0310_def_ring_sizes.patch
>>     22	kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_0320_small_skb_copy.patch
>>     23	kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_0330_child_mtu.patch
>>     24	kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_selector_updated.patch
> OK, I'll review them and submit what I think is important and drop the others.
Good, the only tiny problem is that the merge window on 2.6.26 opened 
eleven days ago, which means its going to be closed soon,  seems we had 
somehow bad timing here, I guess it was not intended, correct?

Anyway, lets review them all now, such that this way or another, each 
patch of this list is either dropped (unsig_udqp ?!) or merged through 
2.6.26 or the for-2.6.27 branch of Roland's tree, OK?

Or.