[ewg] RE: What is the branch that should be used for management packagefor OFED 1.4.1?

[Yevgeny Kliteynik]

Hi Sasha,

Below is the list of the OpenSM commits that should go into OFED 1.4.1:

1. Commit aa25fcba61e75ac94af2b950c200cdde433f110c
   Don't clear sw->need_update if port 0 is active.
   In a single switch subnet, after a fast switch reset, OpenSM
   doesn't configure LFT of the switch and the routing is lost.
   Bug #1507.
    
2. Commit 595f2e30026f9ec85674e6d70661d26de6f77a6b
   Update LFTs when entering master state
   Bug #1469.

3. Commit b44c398e7363e9c9605e9ee1d5893f872ef41feb
   Invalidate routing cache when entering master state
   Bug #1508

4. Commit 22da81f8cd432195f6c78cfe5f508f04b081aef7
   Fix full topology dump in ftree routing.
   Topology dump was missing all the leaf switches
   Bug #1509

5. Commit c07d245651035cc7ba3b89ac0e81d54bff829f4d
   Don't complain about invalid QoS options when its
   default values are used.
   Bug #1451.

6. Commit 72a2fa241dffacc2eea3c2b0c131f8bcb4792162
   Dump SA MAD before sending it, not after.
   Dumping of the SA MAD was done after the MAD was sent
   and returned to the pool, resulting in garbage in
   the OpenSM log.
   Bug #1510.

Anything I missed?


Regards,

Yevgeny Kliteynik

Mellanox Technologies LTD
Tel: +972-4-909-7200 ext: 394
Fax: +972-4-959-3245
P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sasha Khapyorsky [mailto:sashak at voltaire.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 18:19
> To: Tziporet Koren
> Cc: ewg at lists.openfabrics.org; Yevgeny Kliteynik
> Subject: Re: What is the branch that should be used for 
> management packagefor OFED 1.4.1?
> 
> Hi Tziporet,
> 
> On 17:51 Sun 08 Feb     , Tziporet Koren wrote:
> > As you know we are going for OFED 1.4.1 release.
> > What should be the branch to use for this release.
> > This branch should start from the sources in 1.4 and include only 
> > critical bug fixes.
> 
> opensm-3.2
> 
> > Also - what is the list of bugs that you think should be 
> included in 
> > the management package in 1.4.1
> 
> If there are no major complains about OpenSM in OFED-1.4 then 
> we probably could not care.
> 
> Sasha
>