[ewg] Re: What is the branch that should be used for management packagefor OFED 1.4.1?

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

Hi Yevgeny,

On 11:12 Mon 16 Feb     , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> 
> Below is the list of the OpenSM commits that should go into OFED 1.4.1:
> 
> 1. Commit aa25fcba61e75ac94af2b950c200cdde433f110c
>    Don't clear sw->need_update if port 0 is active.
>    In a single switch subnet, after a fast switch reset, OpenSM
>    doesn't configure LFT of the switch and the routing is lost.
>    Bug #1507.
>     
> 2. Commit 595f2e30026f9ec85674e6d70661d26de6f77a6b
>    Update LFTs when entering master state
>    Bug #1469.
> 
> 3. Commit b44c398e7363e9c9605e9ee1d5893f872ef41feb
>    Invalidate routing cache when entering master state
>    Bug #1508
> 
> 4. Commit 22da81f8cd432195f6c78cfe5f508f04b081aef7
>    Fix full topology dump in ftree routing.
>    Topology dump was missing all the leaf switches
>    Bug #1509
> 
> 5. Commit c07d245651035cc7ba3b89ac0e81d54bff829f4d
>    Don't complain about invalid QoS options when its
>    default values are used.
>    Bug #1451.
> 
> 6. Commit 72a2fa241dffacc2eea3c2b0c131f8bcb4792162
>    Dump SA MAD before sending it, not after.
>    Dumping of the SA MAD was done after the MAD was sent
>    and returned to the pool, resulting in garbage in
>    the OpenSM log.
>    Bug #1510.
> 
> Anything I missed?

Don't know. From the list only bug#1507 was considered as "major"
(which is strange, the case should be pretty rear and hardly
reproducible), the rest have "normal" severity.

As far as I remember dot release policy is to include only critical bug
fixes. Isn't it?

Sasha