[ewg] RE: What is the branch that should be used for management packagefor OFED 1.4.1?

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

Hi Tziporet,

On 17:05 Tue 17 Feb     , Tziporet Koren wrote:
> Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>> Hi Sasha,
>>
>> Below is the list of the OpenSM commits that should go into OFED 1.4.1:
>>
>> 1. Commit aa25fcba61e75ac94af2b950c200cdde433f110c
>>    Don't clear sw->need_update if port 0 is active.
>>    In a single switch subnet, after a fast switch reset, OpenSM
>>    doesn't configure LFT of the switch and the routing is lost.
>>    Bug #1507.
>>     2. Commit 595f2e30026f9ec85674e6d70661d26de6f77a6b
>>    Update LFTs when entering master state
>>    Bug #1469.
>>
>> 3. Commit b44c398e7363e9c9605e9ee1d5893f872ef41feb
>>    Invalidate routing cache when entering master state
>>    Bug #1508
>>
>> 4. Commit 22da81f8cd432195f6c78cfe5f508f04b081aef7
>>    Fix full topology dump in ftree routing.
>>    Topology dump was missing all the leaf switches
>>    Bug #1509
>>
>> 5. Commit c07d245651035cc7ba3b89ac0e81d54bff829f4d
>>    Don't complain about invalid QoS options when its
>>    default values are used.
>>    Bug #1451.
>>
>> 6. Commit 72a2fa241dffacc2eea3c2b0c131f8bcb4792162
>>    Dump SA MAD before sending it, not after.
>>    Dumping of the SA MAD was done after the MAD was sent
>>    and returned to the pool, resulting in garbage in
>>    the OpenSM log.
>>    Bug #1510.
>>
>>   
>
> Sasha
> Please open the branch and include the above pathces.
> We also wish the new bug fixed (#1515)

In order to minimize amount of changes which should go to dot release I
would suggest to review the list above - 4-6 are minor IMHO, 1 is rear
(although the fix is safe), 3 is limited by cache use.

Sasha