[ewg] RHEL5 backports and crypto functions

[Brian J. Murrell]

On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 15:19 -0500, Jon Mason wrote:
> 
> Yes, those can be quite tricky.  Let me know if there is anything I can
> do to help.

I think I got it all figured out.

> I'll wait for your ok before sending the patch out for inclusion.  I
> would like for it to be reviewed and tested heavily.

I have yet to run the result through our test framework, but your
proposed patch certainly seems to fix the compilation errors I was
getting.

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ewg/attachments/20090505/3ca84893/attachment.sig>