[ofw] Re: [ewg] RE: SC'09 BOF - Meeting notes and Final Slides
Fab Tillier
ftillier at microsoft.com
Thu Nov 19 20:17:29 PST 2009
Hi Roland
Roland Dreier wrote on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 at 11:19:02
>
>> WinOF has asynchronous interfaces for modify QP, and limited testing
>> has shown that it can improve connection times. QP transitions are
>> probably the second largest component of connection setup after the SA.
>> Since the RDMA CM already provides an asynchronous interface, even
>> existing apps may be able to be able to gain some benefit from this.
>
> can't anyone get async modify QP today on any platform by just doing the
> operation in another thread (or thread pool)? It seems that the
> operations themselves are heavy enough that thread dispatch, locking etc
> is going to be significant overhead.
Why should clients have to emulate asynchronous behavior when the (Mellanox) HCA command interface is already asynchronous?
I would prefer any threading be added to the HCA driver in the kernel, and not as threads in each process. That would enable a seamless transition to a better driver model in the future.
-Fab
More information about the ewg
mailing list