[ewg] OFED-1.5.1 failure over iWarp

Woodruff, Robert J robert.j.woodruff at intel.com
Wed Jan 20 18:12:22 PST 2010


[woody at det-16 ~]$ ucmatose -s  192.168.2.17
cmatose: starting client
[woody at det-17 src]$ ifconfig eth0
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:04:23:AF:8E:CE  
          inet addr:192.168.0.17  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::204:23ff:feaf:8ece/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:1272 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:909 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:41 txqueuelen:100 
          RX bytes:309724 (302.4 KiB)  TX bytes:123706 (120.8 KiB)
          Base address:0xdc00 Memory:f9fa0000-f9fc0000 

[woody at det-17 src]$ ucmatose -b 192.168.0.17
cmatose: starting server
cmatose: bind address failed: No such file or directory
test complete
return status -1

-----Original Message-----
From: Hefty, Sean 
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:19 PM
To: Woodruff, Robert J; tziporet at dev.mellanox.co.il; Tung, Chien Tin; Davis, Arlin R
Cc: OpenFabrics EWG; Steve Wise; Eli Cohen; Vladimir Sokolovsky
Subject: RE: [ewg] OFED-1.5.1 failure over iWarp

>Sean could this be a result of the new Ipv6 rdma_cm patches that were
>added to OFED-1.5.1 ?

I guess it's possible.  I thought DAPL only used ipv4 addresses though.

Can you try running some simpler tests, like ucmatose or rping?

on server side run: ucmatose [-b optional_local_ip_addres]
on client side run: ucmatose -s <server_ip_address>

If you can, run on the server side with and without the -b option.

- Sean




More information about the ewg mailing list