[ewg] OFED-1.5.1 failure over iWarp
Woodruff, Robert J
robert.j.woodruff at intel.com
Wed Jan 20 18:12:22 PST 2010
[woody at det-16 ~]$ ucmatose -s 192.168.2.17
cmatose: starting client
[woody at det-17 src]$ ifconfig eth0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:23:AF:8E:CE
inet addr:192.168.0.17 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::204:23ff:feaf:8ece/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1272 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:909 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:41 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:309724 (302.4 KiB) TX bytes:123706 (120.8 KiB)
Base address:0xdc00 Memory:f9fa0000-f9fc0000
[woody at det-17 src]$ ucmatose -b 192.168.0.17
cmatose: starting server
cmatose: bind address failed: No such file or directory
test complete
return status -1
-----Original Message-----
From: Hefty, Sean
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:19 PM
To: Woodruff, Robert J; tziporet at dev.mellanox.co.il; Tung, Chien Tin; Davis, Arlin R
Cc: OpenFabrics EWG; Steve Wise; Eli Cohen; Vladimir Sokolovsky
Subject: RE: [ewg] OFED-1.5.1 failure over iWarp
>Sean could this be a result of the new Ipv6 rdma_cm patches that were
>added to OFED-1.5.1 ?
I guess it's possible. I thought DAPL only used ipv4 addresses though.
Can you try running some simpler tests, like ucmatose or rping?
on server side run: ucmatose [-b optional_local_ip_addres]
on client side run: ucmatose -s <server_ip_address>
If you can, run on the server side with and without the -b option.
- Sean
More information about the ewg
mailing list