[ewg] nfsrdma fails to write big file,
Mahesh Siddheshwar
siddheshwar.mahesh at sun.com
Wed Mar 3 12:26:40 PST 2010
Hi Tom, Vu,
Tom Tucker wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
>> > + /* > + * Add room for frmr
>> register and invalidate WRs
>> > + * Requests sometimes have two chunks, each chunk
>> > + * requires to have different frmr. The safest
>> > + * WRs required are max_send_wr * 6; however, we
>> > + * get send completions and poll fast enough, it
>> > + * is pretty safe to have max_send_wr * 4. >
>> + */
>> > + ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_wr *= 4;
>>
>> Seems like a bad design if there is a possibility of work queue
>> overflow; if you're counting on events occurring in a particular order
>> or completions being handled "fast enough", then your design is going to
>> fail in some high load situations, which I don't think you want.
>
> Vu,
>
> Would you please try the following:
>
> - Set the multiplier to 5
While trying to test this between a Linux client and Solaris server,
I made the following changes in :
/usr/src/ofa_kernel-1.5.1/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
diff verbs.c.org verbs.c
653c653
< ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_wr *= 3;
---
> ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_wr *= 8;
685c685
< ep->rep_cqinit = ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_wr/2 /* - 1*/;
---
> ep->rep_cqinit = ep->rep_attr.cap.max
(I bumped it to 8)
did make install.
On reboot I see the errors on NFS READs as opposed to WRITEs
as seen before, when I try to read a 10G file from the server.
The client is running: RHEL 5.3 (2.6.18-128.el5PAE) with
OFED-1.5.1-20100223-0740 bits. The client has an Sun IB
HCA: SUN0070130001, MT25418, 2.7.0 firmware, hw_rev = a0.
The server is running Solaris based on snv_128.
rpcdebug output from the client:
==
RPC: 85 call_bind (status 0)
RPC: 85 call_connect xprt ec78d800 is connected
RPC: 85 call_transmit (status 0)
RPC: 85 xprt_prepare_transmit
RPC: 85 xprt_cwnd_limited cong = 0 cwnd = 8192
RPC: 85 rpc_xdr_encode (status 0)
RPC: 85 marshaling UNIX cred eddb4dc0
RPC: 85 using AUTH_UNIX cred eddb4dc0 to wrap rpc data
RPC: 85 xprt_transmit(164)
RPC: rpcrdma_inline_pullup: pad 0 destp 0xf1dd1410 len 164 hdrlen 164
RPC: rpcrdma_register_frmr_external: Using frmr ec7da920 to map 4
segments
RPC: rpcrdma_create_chunks: write chunk elem
16384 at 0x38536d000:0xa601 (more)
RPC: rpcrdma_register_frmr_external: Using frmr ec7da960 to map 1
segments
RPC: rpcrdma_create_chunks: write chunk elem 108 at 0x31dd153c:0xaa01
(last)
RPC: rpcrdma_marshal_req: write chunk: hdrlen 68 rpclen 164 padlen
0 headerp 0xf1dd124c base 0xf1dd136c lkey 0x500
RPC: 85 xmit complete
RPC: 85 sleep_on(queue "xprt_pending" time 4683109)
RPC: 85 added to queue ec78d994 "xprt_pending"
RPC: 85 setting alarm for 60000 ms
RPC: wake_up_next(ec78d944 "xprt_resend")
RPC: wake_up_next(ec78d8f4 "xprt_sending")
RPC: rpcrdma_qp_async_error_upcall: QP error 3 on device mlx4_0 ep
ec78db40
RPC: 85 __rpc_wake_up_task (now 4683110)
RPC: 85 disabling timer
RPC: 85 removed from queue ec78d994 "xprt_pending"
RPC: __rpc_wake_up_task done
RPC: 85 __rpc_execute flags=0x1
RPC: 85 call_status (status -107)
RPC: 85 call_bind (status 0)
RPC: 85 call_connect xprt ec78d800 is not connected
RPC: 85 xprt_connect xprt ec78d800 is not connected
RPC: 85 sleep_on(queue "xprt_pending" time 4683110)
RPC: 85 added to queue ec78d994 "xprt_pending"
RPC: 85 setting alarm for 60000 ms
RPC: rpcrdma_event_process: event rep ec116800 status 5 opcode 80
length 2493606
RPC: rpcrdma_event_process: recv WC status 5, connection lost
RPC: rpcrdma_conn_upcall: disconnected: ec78dbccI4:20049 (ep
0xec78db40 event 0xa)
RPC: rpcrdma_conn_upcall: disconnected
rpcrdma: connection to ec78dbccI4:20049 closed (-103)
RPC: xprt_rdma_connect_worker: reconnect
==
On the server I see:
Mar 3 17:45:16 elena-ar hermon: [ID 271130 kern.notice] NOTICE:
hermon0: Device Error: CQE remote access error
Mar 3 17:45:16 elena-ar nfssrv: [ID 819430 kern.notice] NOTICE: NFS:
bad sendreply
Mar 3 17:45:21 elena-ar hermon: [ID 271130 kern.notice] NOTICE:
hermon0: Device Error: CQE remote access error
Mar 3 17:45:21 elena-ar nfssrv: [ID 819430 kern.notice] NOTICE: NFS:
bad sendreply
The remote access error is actually seen on RDMA_WRITE.
Doing some more debug on the server with DTrace, I see that
the destination address and length matches the write chunk
element in the Linux debug output above.
0 9385 rib_write:entry daddr 38536d000, len 4000,
hdl a601
0 9358 rib_init_sendwait:return ffffff44a715d308
1 9296 rib_svc_scq_handler:return 1f7
1 9356 rib_sendwait:return 14
1 9386 rib_write:return 14
^^^ that is RDMA_FAILED in
1 63295 xdrrdma_send_read_data:return 0
1 5969 xdr_READ3res:return
1 5969 xdr_READ3res:return 0
Is this a variation of the previously discussed issue or something new?
Thanks,
Mahesh
> - Set the number of buffer credits small as follows "echo 4 >
> /proc/sys/sunrpc/rdma_slot_table_entries"
> - Rerun your test and see if you can reproduce the problem?
>
> I did the above and was unable to reproduce, but I would like to see
> if you can to convince ourselves that 5 is the right number.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>> - R.
>>
>
More information about the ewg
mailing list