[ewg] [PATCHv8 07/11] ib_core: Add API to support IBoE from userspace

Roland Dreier rdreier at cisco.com
Thu May 13 12:18:23 PDT 2010


 > Basically, what I want to understand is why does this change make sense?
 > 
 > @@ -1139,6 +1139,10 @@ struct ib_device {
 >  						  struct ib_grh *in_grh,
 >  						  struct ib_mad *in_mad,
 >  						  struct ib_mad *out_mad);
 > +	int			   (*get_eth_l2_addr)(struct ib_device *device,
 > u8 port,
 > +						      union ib_gid *dgid, int
 > sgid_idx,
 > +						      u8 *mac, u16 *vlan_id, u8
 > *tagged);
 > +

Yes, that was pretty much my original question.  Why do we have a verb
for userspace to call a device-specific method to do the mapping?  The
layering seems wrong somewhere if we have a generic verb to do this
mapping, but then put the mapping in device-specific code.

 - R.
-- 
Roland Dreier <rolandd at cisco.com> || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html



More information about the ewg mailing list