[openib-general] [ANNOUNCE] GSI Implementation Candidate
Ted Wilcox
ted at topspin.com
Tue Aug 3 23:55:54 PDT 2004
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:58:54AM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Hal> I agree in general with this but: There is no requirement to
> > Hal> send with GRH (only to receive with GRH) (until multisubnet
> > Hal> is supported which is currently an incomplete aspect of IBA).
> > Hal> I have not added this one into the TODO (at least yet)...
> >
> > Don't the current set of IB compliance tests try sending a request
> > with GRH (and expect a response with GRH)? If you can receive
> > requests with GRHs, then the response generation rules require the
> > response to be sent with a GRH as well.
>
> Can't speak to the current set of IB compliances without doing
> some homework on them but you are right that there is an extra
> (C13-52.1.1) compliance for MAD responses which requires
> a response with GRH to be sent if a request with GRH was
> received. I will update the TODO list with this.
The compliance tests do check this, at least as of the last plugfest.
It's good to have on the list.
-Ted.
More information about the general
mailing list