[openib-general] more ib_verbs.h nits

[Sean Hefty]

On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:53:06 -0400
Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com> wrote:

> enum ib_qp_attr_mask {
>  IB_QP_STATE   = 1,
>  IB_QP_EN_SQD_ASYNC_NOTIFY = (1<<1),
>  IB_QP_REMOTE_ATOMIC_FLAGS = (1<<3),
> 
> Should IB_QP_REMOTE_ATOMIC_FLAGS be 1<<2 and so on for the bits after that
> one ?

I had removed the mask that was (1<<2) and didn't updates the other values.  I was just going to insert a new entry at that location.  (E.g. I need to add support to resize the QP.)

 
> Also, should ib_get_special_qp be called ib_create_special_qp ?

I used "get" to better match the terminology given in the spec.  (It's probably what VAPI used as well.)

Btw, please continue to send nits like these.