[openib-general] [PATCH] for review to timeout send MADs
Roland Dreier
roland.list at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 07:19:51 PDT 2004
> I am using the system level queue. If we think that using our own MAD queue
> is better, I will do that. I was thinking more along the lines of a single
> workqueue for all MAD services, with one per processor, rather than a
> workqueue per port, however.
I don't think the system keventd queue is appropriate for completion handling;
I definitely think we should have a MAD layer workqueue.
I think it's OK to have a single workqueue for the whole MAD layer;
it's probably
not scalable to systems with a huge number of HCAs, but the right fix for that
is more likely to be moving to softirq/timer context anyway.
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list