[openib-general] Kernel 2.6.9
Roland Dreier
roland at topspin.com
Fri Oct 22 13:26:57 PDT 2004
Hal> I do not understand why the lack of the timeout code or the
Hal> replacement of the MAD thread with a workqueue needs to be
Hal> completed before you can integrate. I think there is
Hal> sufficient functionality there now to get this up and
Hal> running. The code will continue to evolve anyhow.
Hal> The changes that have made and put into the openib-candidate
Hal> tree make it possible to not have to pull it into your tree
Hal> and track all the changes.
My general policy is that I don't commit changes that break IPoIB on
my tree. If I cut over to using new MAD code (+ new SA query API etc)
without the new MAD code in my tree then my tree is broken. So I want
to wait until the major work on the MAD code is done before I put it
on my tree. Also my new SA code isn't quite done anyway.
In any case I think I'll integrate the new MAD stuff on Monday no
matter where it stands, and we can just deal with merging changes back
and forth.
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list