[openib-general] Handling SM class (SMInfo vs. other queries)
Roland Dreier
roland at topspin.com
Mon Oct 25 13:10:58 PDT 2004
Roland> I guess right before dispatch to other clients -- there's
Roland> no way for the low-level driver to tell whether or not the
Roland> hop_count/hop_ptr checks and updates have been done or
Roland> not, so it would just (incorrectly) consume the MAD and
Roland> generate a response the first time around.
Hal> Do the responses get back to the SM ? If so, would there be 2
Hal> responses for certain things ?
This shouldn't happen -- I was just describing what would happen if we
followed Sean's idea of passing the same MAD to the low-level driver
twice. Just to be clear -- SMI checks should happen before the
low-level driver gets the MAD, and the low-level driver should only
get the MAD once (and only generate one reply if necessary).
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list