[openib-general] Re: ib_mad.c comments

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 13:07, Sean Hefty wrote:
> I'm not sure that we need to maintain lists for redirected QPs.  The user owns
> posting the receives on that QP, so will have set the wr_id to something use 
> for them.  When the redirected QP is destroyed, the user should get completions 
> for all posted receives.

Which component's responsibility is it to generate the completions on QP
destruction ?

> For QP0/1, the access layer owns the receive lists, so should be able to 
> set the wr_id to whatever it needs in order to recover the buffers.

That's what's already being done. For QP0 and 1, wr_id is only
meaningful internally.

-- Hal