[openib-general] Re: ib_mad.c comments

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 13:07, Sean Hefty wrote:
> > I was thinking this (separate receive lists for QPs 0 and 1) but was not
> > quite there. I will now be doing this shortly. This also seems to mean a
> > list for every redirected QP too :-( That is a future item.
> 
> I'm not sure that we need to maintain lists for redirected QPs.  
> The user owns posting the receives on that QP, so will have set 
> the wr_id to something use for them.  When the redirected QP is 
> destroyed, the user should get completions for all posted receives.
> 
> For QP0/1, the access layer owns the receive lists, so 
> should be able to set the wr_id to whatever it needs in 
> order to recover the buffers.

What about send lists for redirected QPs ? I presume the MAD layer would
maintain those (for response/request matching, timeouts).

-- Hal