[openib-general] ib_mad shutdown WC status code ?
Sean Hefty
mshefty at ichips.intel.com
Fri Sep 24 10:45:04 PDT 2004
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:41:44 -0400
Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com> wrote:
> Sean Hefty wrote:
> > I think that flushed makes sense. With queuing in the access layer,
> > we should be able to stop and restart the QP in most error cases
> > without affecting the user. If the link goes down, flushing the
> > requests seems reasonable. What other cases would cause the MAD
> > layer to shut down?
>
> Module removal/shutdown.
Are we expecting to be able to do this with active users of the access layer?
Even in this case, I think flushed works, since the QP is being destroyed.
More information about the general
mailing list