[openib-general] [PATCH] Fix MAD completion handling

[Sean Hefty]

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:49:15 -0700
Roland Dreier <roland at topspin.com> wrote:

>     Sean> Shouldn't we be able to keep the ib_req_notify_cq at the end
>     Sean> of this function?  If additional completions are left after
>     Sean> polling, a second event should be generated.  Or at least
>     Sean> that's what I remember from out discussions about this...
> 
> On Mellanox HCAs but not necessarily on spec-compliant HW...

I realize that, but I thought that's the behavior that we agreed that the API would have.  I'm really fine either way, but want to be clear on the behavior.